In re Armando E. Herrera
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/7/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 43 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 38 Motion for TRO. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARMANDO E. HERRERA,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:14-cv-2939 KJM AC P
ORDER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as
19
provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 22, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 43. Petitioner
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 44.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court
26
finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 22, 2016 (ECF No. 43), are adopted
3
4
5
in full; and
2. Petitioner’s motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 38) is denied.
Dated: March 7, 2016
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?