Yee v. Sacramento County, Jail et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/6/2020 DENYING 64 Motion to Compel without prejudice and the 7/10/2020 hearing is VACATED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VINCENT YEE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2955 KJM DB PS

v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff Vincent Yee is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the

17
18

undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
On June 5, 2020, defendants filed a motion to compel and noticed the motion for hearing

19
20

before the undersigned on July 10, 2020. (ECF No. 64.) However, pursuant to the Status

21

(Pretrial Scheduling) Order issued on November 19, 2019, discovery in this action must be

22

“completed by July 10, 2020.” (ECF No. 56 at 2.) “‘[C]ompleted’ means that all discovery shall

23

have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to

24

discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has

25

been ordered, the order has been complied with.” (Id.) A hearing on the day discovery closes

26

does not provide sufficient time to hear defendants’ motion, issue an order, and allow for the

27

order to be complied with prior to the close of discovery.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ June 5, 2020 motion to compel

2

(ECF No. 64) is denied without prejudice and the July 10, 2020 hearing is vacated.

3

Dated: July 6, 2020

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.pro se\yee2955.disc.unt.ord

24
25
26
27
28
2