Blackman v. Stainer et al
Filing
9
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/24/2015 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this action; AND RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 8 application to proceed ifp be denied, and plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee within 30 days of the adoption of these findings and recommendations. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY BLACKMAN,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2958 KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
STAINER, et al.,
15
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). For
19
the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s request to proceed in
20
forma pauperis be denied.
A prisoner may not proceed in forma pauperis:
21
22
if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated
or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of
the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is
frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious
physical injury.
23
24
25
26
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
27
////
28
////
1
1
Court records reflect that on at least three prior occasions, plaintiff has brought actions
2
while incarcerated that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon
3
which relief may be granted. See: 1) Blackman v. Taxdahl, No. 1:04-cv-6389 AWI LJO (May
4
18, 2007 E.D. Cal.) (order dismissing action for failure to state a claim); 2) Blackman v. Evans,
5
No. 1:06-cv-0081 GSA (Feb. 3, 2009 E.D. Cal.) (order dismissing action for failure to state a
6
claim); and 3) Blackman v. Medina, 3: 05-cv-5390 SI (Mar. 13, 2006 N.D. Cal.) (order
7
dismissing action for failure to state a claim). See also Blackman v. Hedgpath, 1:10-cv-1393 LJO
8
MJS (Aug. 11, 2010 E.D. Cal.) (order designating plaintiff a three strikes litigant for purposes of
9
section 1915(g).)
10
The section 1915(g) exception applies if the complaint makes a plausible allegation that
11
the prisoner faced “imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time of filing. 28 U.S.C. §
12
1915(g); Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1055 (9th Cir. 2007). Although somewhat
13
difficult to understand, it appears that plaintiff is claiming that defendants interfered with his
14
ability to file administrative grievances as well as with his ability to challenge his criminal
15
convictions. These claims do not suggest that plaintiff faced imminent danger of serious physical
16
injury at the time he filed the complaint. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that
17
plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.
18
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district
judge to this action; and
20
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma
21
pauperis (ECF No. 8) be denied; and plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days of
22
the adoption of these findings and recommendations.
23
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
24
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
25
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
26
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
27
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
28
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
2
1
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
2
Dated: February 24, 2015
3
4
5
6
7
Black2958.56
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?