Porter v. City of Davis Police Department et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/17/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 5 Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LASONJA PORTER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2984 KJM DAD PS

v.

ORDER

CITY OF DAVIS POLICE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff Lasonja Porter is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the

17
18

undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
On June 16, 2015, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and granted plaintiff

19
20

leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days. (Dkt. No. 4.) On July 8, 2015,

21

plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file an amended complaint, explaining that

22

plaintiff was about to undergo surgery. (Dkt. No. 5.) Attached to plaintiff’s request is a letter

23

from her doctor confirming that plaintiff was scheduled to have surgery on July 10, 2015.
Having reviewed plaintiff’s filing, the undersigned finds good cause to grant plaintiff’s

24
25

request for an extension of time.

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. Plaintiff’s July 8, 2015 request for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 5) is granted; and

3

2. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date of this

4

order.1

5

Dated: July 17, 2015

6
7
8
9

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\porter2984.eot.ord.docx

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action, plaintiff may file a notice of
voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
2