Mitchell v. Brown et al

Filing 49

ORDER ADOPTING 47 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 01/05/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's 45 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RODERICK L. MITCHELL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-2993 MCE AC

v.

ORDER

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Of California; and JAMES C. SANCHEZ,
City Attorney Of Sacramento,

16

Defendants.

17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States

18
19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

20

On November14, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 47.

23

Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations on December 5, 2016. ECF No.

24

48.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

26

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

27

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

28

analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 14, 2016 (ECF No. 47), are

3

adopted in full; and

4

2. Plaintiff Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: January 5, 2017

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2