Wolff et al v. Eli Lilly & Company
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/23/2015 GRANTING 6 Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application continuing the Scheduling Conference to 7/20/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A joint status report shall be filed by 7/6/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
Michael L. Baum (SBN: 119511)
mbaum@baumhedlundlaw.com
R. Brent Wisner (SBN: 276023)
rbwisner@baumhedlundlaw.com
BAUM HEDLUND ARISTEI & GOLDMAN, P.C.
12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Tel: (310) 207-3233
Fax: (310) 820-7444
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
KATRYNA WOLFF; DONALD WILLIAM
)
RUDDELL; JAMES HENERY AMUNDSEN; )
TONY LABELL HARRISON; MARTIN
)
ADELIDO HERRERA; GLORIA J. JORDAN; )
PEARLIE MAE MADDOX; DENISE KAY
)
VITAL; WILLIAM GEORGE BOOKER;
)
BOBBI JEAN WOOD; GOLDIE FAYE
)
ANDERSON; JAMES CALDWELL;
)
CHRISTINA and ROBERT BAILEY;
)
PATRICIA ANN JACKSON; WENDY
)
DENESE DANIELS; ARTHUR LEE DAVIS; )
RONNIE DAVIS; YOLANDA NECOLE
)
JORDAN; SAMUEL EARL SMITH;
)
STEPHEN THOMAS MAGEE; SANDRA
)
JEAN MENDOZA; LISA DENISE SMITH;
)
BEVERLY THURMAN; DAVID J.
)
ADAMCHICK; JOYCE LIGHTLY; LORETTA )
PRESSLEY; MELODIE REHM; ERICA
)
SHUNOSKI; CARLA TURNER,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, an Indiana
)
corporation,
)
Defendant.
)
Case No.: 2:14-cv-03004-WBS-EFB
Hon. William B. Shubb
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL
STATUS CONFERENCE
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
With good cause shown and having considered Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to
Continue Initial Status Conference,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for July 20,
4
2015 at 2:00 p.m. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than July 6, 20015.
5
Dated: April 23, 2015
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?