Iegorova v. Lieninger

Filing 6

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/22/16 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed; referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15

v.

No. 2:14-cv-3016-GEB-EFB PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CHARLES LIENINGER,

16

Defendant.

17
On May 17, 2016, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend.1 The

18
19

order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended

20

complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended

21

complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 3. On June

22

22, 2016, the court granted plaintiff an additional thirty days in which to file an amended

23

complaint.
The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise

24
25

responded to the order.

26

/////

27
28

1

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the
undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1

1
2

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the
Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.

3

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

4

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

5

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

6

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

7

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time

8

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455

9

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

10

Dated: August 22, 2016.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2