Frungillo v Imperia Entertainment
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/26/16 ORDERING that the judgment debtor examination, set for 11/16/16 is VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL FRUNGILLO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-mc-0047 KJM CKD
v.
ORDER
IMPERIA ENTERTAINMENT, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
This matter is currently scheduled for a judgment debtor exam on November 16, 2016.
18
The currently scheduled exam is the third judgment debtor exam plaintiff has attempted in this
19
District. At the first examination, plaintiff’s counsel indicated that the Quail Lakes Drive address
20
listed on the defendant’s website appears to be just a mail drop and that no business is conducted
21
there. The proof of service for the current examination indicates that the registered agent for
22
service of process was served at a Nevada address. Under California Code of Civil Procedure
23
section 708.110, the judgment debtor must be personally served. Plaintiff’s service by Federal
24
Express of the order for examination is therefore insufficient.
The court takes judicial notice of the records of the Secretaries of State for California and
25
26
Nevada. There is no Viratech Corp. registered to do business in California. Viratech Corp. is a
27
Nevada corporation with all of its officers listed with a Nevada address. Reviewing the record,
28
/////
1
1
there appears to be no impediment to conducting a judgment debtor examination in Nevada and
2
that a judgment debtor examination in this District is improvident.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment debtor examination, set for
4
November 16, 2016, is vacated.
5
Dated: October 26, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
4 frungillo47.jde
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?