Frungillo v Imperia Entertainment

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/26/16 ORDERING that the judgment debtor examination, set for 11/16/16 is VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL FRUNGILLO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-mc-0047 KJM CKD v. ORDER IMPERIA ENTERTAINMENT, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is currently scheduled for a judgment debtor exam on November 16, 2016. 18 The currently scheduled exam is the third judgment debtor exam plaintiff has attempted in this 19 District. At the first examination, plaintiff’s counsel indicated that the Quail Lakes Drive address 20 listed on the defendant’s website appears to be just a mail drop and that no business is conducted 21 there. The proof of service for the current examination indicates that the registered agent for 22 service of process was served at a Nevada address. Under California Code of Civil Procedure 23 section 708.110, the judgment debtor must be personally served. Plaintiff’s service by Federal 24 Express of the order for examination is therefore insufficient. The court takes judicial notice of the records of the Secretaries of State for California and 25 26 Nevada. There is no Viratech Corp. registered to do business in California. Viratech Corp. is a 27 Nevada corporation with all of its officers listed with a Nevada address. Reviewing the record, 28 ///// 1 1 there appears to be no impediment to conducting a judgment debtor examination in Nevada and 2 that a judgment debtor examination in this District is improvident. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment debtor examination, set for 4 November 16, 2016, is vacated. 5 Dated: October 26, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 4 frungillo47.jde 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?