United States of America v. Approximately $14,600.00 in U.S. Currency et al
Filing
4
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/3/14 ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 10/6/2014. (Becknal, R)
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2 KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U. S. Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700
5 Attorneys for the United States
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
APPROXIMATELY $14,600.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY, and
16
APPROXIMATELY $5,900.00 IN U.S.
CURRENCY,
17
2:14-MC-00048-LKK-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING
A COMPLAINT FOR
FORFEITURE AND/OR TO
OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT
ALLEGING FORFEITURE
Defendants.
18
19
It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and
20 claimant Felipe S. Gonzalez (“claimant”), by and through their respective counsel, as
21 follows:
22
1.
On or about January 9, 2014, claimant Felipe S. Gonzalez filed a claim, in
23 the administrative forfeiture proceedings, with the Drug Enforcement Administration
24 with respect to the Approximately $14,600.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately
25 $5,900.00 in U.S. Currency (collectively “defendant currency”), which was seized on
26 August 7, 2013.
27
2.
The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of
28 intent to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties.
1
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
1 The time has expired for any person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18
2 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than the claimant has filed a claim to the
3 defendant currency as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding.
4
3.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a
5 complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment
6 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a
7 claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the court
8 extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. The
9 deadline was April 9, 2014.
10
4.
By Stipulation and Order filed April 9, 2014, the parties stipulated to
11 extend to July 8, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil
12 complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment
13 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture.
14
5.
As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement for
15 an extension to October 6, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file
16 a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an
17 indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture.
18 ///
19 ///
20 ///
21 ///
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
2
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
1
6.
Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United
2 States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant
3 currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject
4 to forfeiture shall be extended to October 6, 2014.
5 Dated:
7/2/2014
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
6
7
By:
8
9
10
Dated:
7/2/2014
/s/ Kevin C. Khasigian
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
12
/s/ Mark J. Reichel
MARK J. REICHEL
Attorney for claimant
Felipe S. Gonzalez
13
(As authorized via phone)
11
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
Dated: July 3, 2014.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?