United States of America v. Brayshaw
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/6/2014 ORDERING Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW, shall appear in Redding, California at a date, time,and place set by agreement or in writing by Revenue Agent Crystal Langston or any other proper offi cer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, and shall testify concerning the matters inquired into by the summons issued by investigating Revenue Agent Crystal Langston on May 29, 2013.Respondent has withdrawn the service defense asserted in her Response filed July 28, 2014.Document production, and testimony occasioned by document production, shall be dealt with in future orders.Show Cause Hearing CONTINUED to 8/21/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.. (Waggoner, D)
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2 YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194
Assistant United States Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: (916) 554-2760
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
5 email: yoshinori.himel@usdoj.gov
6 Attorneys for Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
7 R. TODD LUOMA (Cal. State Bar No. 140066)
BETTY J. WILLIAMS (Cal. State Bar No. 224793)
8 Law Office of Williams & Associates, PC
3600 American River Drive, Suite 135
9 Sacramento, CA 95864
(916) 488-8501
10 (916) 488-8196 fax
todd@williamslawassociates.com
11 betty@williamslawassociates.com
12 Attorneys for Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
16
v.
17
18 NORA BRAYSHAW,
Respondent.
19
CASE NO. 2:14-MC-00088-MCE-KJN
CONSENT ORDER INITIATING
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
Date: Aug. 7, 2014
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Ctrm: 25 (Judge Newman)
20
21
The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject
22 to the approval of the Court as provided for herein, as follows:
23
1. That Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW, shall appear in Redding, California at a date,
24 time, and place set by agreement or in writing by Revenue Agent Crystal Langston or any other
25 proper officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, and shall testify concerning the
26 matters inquired into by the summons issued by investigating Revenue Agent Crystal Langston
27 on May 29, 2013.
28
2. That Respondent withdraws the service defense asserted in her Response filed July 28,
1 CONSENT ORDER ENFORCING INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
1
1 2014.
3. That document production, and testimony occasioned by document production, be
2
3 dealt with in future orders.
4. That the hearing set for August 7, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., before Judge Newman, be
4
5 CONTINUED until August 21, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.
6
7
Dated: August 5, 2014
8
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
By: /s/ YHimel
YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194
Assistant United States Attorney
9
10
11
Dated: _August 6, 2014
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAMS
& ASSOCIATES, PC
12
By: /s/ R. Todd Luoma
R. TODD LUOMA (Cal. State Bar No.
140066)
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
1. Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW, shall appear in Redding, California at a date, time,
18 and place set by agreement or in writing by Revenue Agent Crystal Langston or any other
19 proper officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, and shall testify concerning the
20 matters inquired into by the summons issued by investigating Revenue Agent Crystal Langston
21 on May 29, 2013.
22
2. Respondent has withdrawn the service defense asserted in her Response filed July 28,
23 2014.
24
3. Document production, and testimony occasioned by document production, shall be
25 dealt with in future orders.
26
4. The hearing set for August 7, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., before Judge Newman, is
27 CONTINUED until August 21, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.
28
2 CONSENT ORDER ENFORCING INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
2
1
It is APPROVED and SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: August 6, 2014
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 CONSENT ORDER ENFORCING INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?