United States of America v. Brayshaw

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/6/2014 ORDERING Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW, shall appear in Redding, California at a date, time,and place set by agreement or in writing by Revenue Agent Crystal Langston or any other proper offi cer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, and shall testify concerning the matters inquired into by the summons issued by investigating Revenue Agent Crystal Langston on May 29, 2013.Respondent has withdrawn the service defense asserted in her Response filed July 28, 2014.Document production, and testimony occasioned by document production, shall be dealt with in future orders.Show Cause Hearing CONTINUED to 8/21/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194 Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2760 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 email: yoshinori.himel@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 7 R. TODD LUOMA (Cal. State Bar No. 140066) BETTY J. WILLIAMS (Cal. State Bar No. 224793) 8 Law Office of Williams & Associates, PC 3600 American River Drive, Suite 135 9 Sacramento, CA 95864 (916) 488-8501 10 (916) 488-8196 fax todd@williamslawassociates.com 11 betty@williamslawassociates.com 12 Attorneys for Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, 16 v. 17 18 NORA BRAYSHAW, Respondent. 19 CASE NO. 2:14-MC-00088-MCE-KJN CONSENT ORDER INITIATING COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS Date: Aug. 7, 2014 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 25 (Judge Newman) 20 21 The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject 22 to the approval of the Court as provided for herein, as follows: 23 1. That Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW, shall appear in Redding, California at a date, 24 time, and place set by agreement or in writing by Revenue Agent Crystal Langston or any other 25 proper officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, and shall testify concerning the 26 matters inquired into by the summons issued by investigating Revenue Agent Crystal Langston 27 on May 29, 2013. 28 2. That Respondent withdraws the service defense asserted in her Response filed July 28, 1 CONSENT ORDER ENFORCING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS 1 1 2014. 3. That document production, and testimony occasioned by document production, be 2 3 dealt with in future orders. 4. That the hearing set for August 7, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., before Judge Newman, be 4 5 CONTINUED until August 21, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. 6 7 Dated: August 5, 2014 8 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/ YHimel YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194 Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 11 Dated: _August 6, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, PC 12 By: /s/ R. Todd Luoma R. TODD LUOMA (Cal. State Bar No. 140066) 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 1. Respondent, NORA BRAYSHAW, shall appear in Redding, California at a date, time, 18 and place set by agreement or in writing by Revenue Agent Crystal Langston or any other 19 proper officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, and shall testify concerning the 20 matters inquired into by the summons issued by investigating Revenue Agent Crystal Langston 21 on May 29, 2013. 22 2. Respondent has withdrawn the service defense asserted in her Response filed July 28, 23 2014. 24 3. Document production, and testimony occasioned by document production, shall be 25 dealt with in future orders. 26 4. The hearing set for August 7, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., before Judge Newman, is 27 CONTINUED until August 21, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. 28 2 CONSENT ORDER ENFORCING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS 2 1 It is APPROVED and SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: August 6, 2014 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 CONSENT ORDER ENFORCING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?