USA v. Dhillon, II
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/4/14. The Application to terminate the Writ of Garnishment is GRANTED. The 8/26/14 writ of garnishment against defendant Rajinder Kaur Dhillon II is TERMINATED. (Manzer, C)
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2 KURT A. DIDIER
Assistant United States Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: 916-554-2700
Facsimile: 916-554-2900
5
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
RAJINDER KAUR DHILLON II,
18
CRIMINAL CASE NO.: 2:12-CR-0300-MCE
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER
TERMINATING WRIT OF
GARNISHMENT; AND ORDER
Defendant and Judgment Debtor.
[NO HEARING REQUESTED]
16
17
MISC. CASE NO.: 2:14-MC-0108-GEB-KJN
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Garnishee.
19
20
By this garnishment proceeding, the United States recovered the statutory assessment and
21 restitution imposed against defendant Rajinder Kaur Dhillon II in the criminal case referenced above.
22 Accordingly, the United States seeks an order terminating the writ of garnishment pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
23 § 3205(c)(10)(C) (satisfaction of the debt).
24
Respectfully submitted,
25
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
26
27 Dated: October 30, 2014
28
/s/ Kurt A. Didier______________
KURT A. DIDIER
Assistant United States Attorney
APPLICATION FOR ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT
ORDER
1
2
The Court, having reviewed the court files and the United States’ Application for an Order
3 Terminating Writ of Garnishment (the “Application”) and finding good cause therefor, hereby
4 GRANTS the Application. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(C), the writ of
5 garnishment previously issued on August 26, 2014 against defendant Rajinder Kaur Dhillon II is
6 TERMINATED.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated: November 4, 2014
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 Order
30
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?