USA v. Dhillon, II

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/4/14. The Application to terminate the Writ of Garnishment is GRANTED. The 8/26/14 writ of garnishment against defendant Rajinder Kaur Dhillon II is TERMINATED. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 KURT A. DIDIER Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: 916-554-2700 Facsimile: 916-554-2900 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 RAJINDER KAUR DHILLON II, 18 CRIMINAL CASE NO.: 2:12-CR-0300-MCE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TERMINATING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT; AND ORDER Defendant and Judgment Debtor. [NO HEARING REQUESTED] 16 17 MISC. CASE NO.: 2:14-MC-0108-GEB-KJN BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Garnishee. 19 20 By this garnishment proceeding, the United States recovered the statutory assessment and 21 restitution imposed against defendant Rajinder Kaur Dhillon II in the criminal case referenced above. 22 Accordingly, the United States seeks an order terminating the writ of garnishment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 23 § 3205(c)(10)(C) (satisfaction of the debt). 24 Respectfully submitted, 25 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 26 27 Dated: October 30, 2014 28 /s/ Kurt A. Didier______________ KURT A. DIDIER Assistant United States Attorney APPLICATION FOR ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT ORDER 1 2 The Court, having reviewed the court files and the United States’ Application for an Order 3 Terminating Writ of Garnishment (the “Application”) and finding good cause therefor, hereby 4 GRANTS the Application. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(C), the writ of 5 garnishment previously issued on August 26, 2014 against defendant Rajinder Kaur Dhillon II is 6 TERMINATED. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: November 4, 2014 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Order 30

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?