In Re: J. Pedro Zarate

Filing 1

ORDER from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel TRANSFERRING the Appellant's IFP Motion to the US District Court for the limited purpose of ruling on the IFP Motion. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FILED OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: J. PEDRO ZARATE, Debtor. J. PEDRO ZARATE, Appellant, v. UMPQUA BANK; GEOFFREY RICHARDS, Trustee, Appellees. Before: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dec 04, 2014 BAP No. EC-14-1371 Bk. No. CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13-22346 CAED Case # 2:14-mc-0143 MCE KJN (PS) ORDER TRANSFERRING IFP MOTION PAPPAS and KURTZ, Bankruptcy Judges. Appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with respect to this appeal ("IFP Motion"). A Clerk's Notice was issued by the BAP, giving the bankruptcy court the opportunity to make a certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) regarding whether the appeal is frivolous. No certification was made by the trial court. Under the holding of Perroton v. Gray (In re Perroton), 958 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1992) and Determan v. Sandoval (In re Sandoval), 186 B.R. 490, 496 (9th Cir. BAP 1995), the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has no authority to grant or deny in forma pauperis motions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) because bankruptcy courts are not "court[s] of the United States" as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 451. Therefore, appellant's IFP Motion is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for the limited purpose of ruling on the IFP Motion. It is appellant's responsibility to take all necessary steps to have the IFP Motion considered by the district court within a reasonable period of time. No later than Monday, January 5, 2015, appellant must file with the Panel and serve on opposing counsel a written response which includes as an exhibit a copy of the district court’s order on the IFP Motion or an explanation of the steps appellant has taken to have the IFP Motion considered by the district court. For the convenience of the district court, copies of the notice of appeal, the order on appeal, and the IFP motion are attached to this order. Failure to comply with the requirements of this order may result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice to the parties. 8018(a)(2). 9th Cir. BAP R. PACER fee: Exempt General Docket U. S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Docket #: 14-1371 J. Zarate v. Umpqua Bank, et al Appeal From: California Eastern - Sacramento Fee Status: fee due Case Type Information: 1) Bankruptcy 2) Chapter 7 Non-Business 3) null Originating Court Information: District: 0972-2 : 13-22346-C-7 Presiding Judge: Christopher M. Klein, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Date Filed: 02/22/2013 Date Order/Judgment: Date NOA Filed: 07/09/2014 07/22/2014 Date Rec 07/24/201 Prior Cases: None Current Cases: None Panel Assignment: Not available In re: J. PEDRO ZARATE Debtor -----------------------------J. PEDRO ZARATE Appellant J. Pedro Zarate Direct: 916-525-1257 [NTC Pro Se] 8192 Creek Estates Way Sacramento, CA 95829 v. UMPQUA BANK Appellee David Marvin Wiseblood, Esquire Direct: 415-547-2700 [COR LD NTC Retained] LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. WISEBL Suite 2000 601 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 GEOFFREY RICHARDS, Trustee Appellee Dana A. Suntag, Esquire, Attorney Direct: 209-472-7700 [COR LD NTC Retained] Herum Crabtree Suntag Suite 222 5757 Pacific Avenue Stockton, CA 95207 In re: J. PEDRO ZARATE Debtor -----------------------------J. PEDRO ZARATE Appellant v. UMPQUA BANK; GEOFFREY RICHARDS, Trustee Appellees 07/24/2014 1 8 pg, 206.13 KB 08/04/2014 2 3 pg, 98.04 KB 08/04/2014 3 3 pg, 49.45 KB 08/14/2014 4 2 pg, 58.06 KB 08/20/2014 5 11 pg, 260.85 KB 08/20/2014 6 1 pg, 36.04 KB 09/08/2014 7 10 pg, 237.79 KB 09/08/2014 8 1 pg, 22.29 KB Received notice of appeal filed in Bankruptcy Court on 07/22/2014, and copy o [Entered: 08/01/2014 04:11 PM] Notice to all parties and Bankruptcy Court RE: BAP Case number assigned: EC Record Request Form to Bankruptcy Court. (VJ) [Entered: 08/04/2014 10:03 A Sent BRIEFING ORDER & NOTICE to appellant J. Pedro Zarate. Copies to all Zarate's opening brief due 09/18/2014. (VJ) [Entered: 08/04/2014 10:14 AM] Notice of Deficiency sent to Appellant RE: Filing/Docketing fee not paid (lack of Response Due: 08/28/2014. cc: All parties. (VJ) [Entered: 08/14/2014 12:32 PM Filed original and copies of Appellant J. Pedro Zarate's motion to extend time to 09/04/2014 w/ copy of declaration, points and authorities and proposed order; s ( Motion forwarded from Bk.Ct. filed 8/18/14 ) (VJ) [Entered: 08/20/2014 01:31 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: vjw) Motion to extend time to file ROA filed by J. Ped 9/4/14; dated: 08/20/2014. (Note: Filing fee due: 8/28/14) (VJ) [Entered: 08/20/ Filed ( Bk.Ct 9/4/14) original and copies of Party J. Pedro Zarate's 2nd motion e appellant's Record on appeal until 09/18/2014; served on 9/4/14. (VJ) [Entered Filed (9/2/14) original of Appellant J. Pedro Zarate's motion to proceed in forma pos). (VJ) [Entered: 09/08/2014 10:41 AM] 2 pg, 14.05 KB 09/19/2014 09/23/2014 Filed order ( Clerk: sms) ; This Clerk’s Notice is being issued to allow the trial c [y] in writing that [the appeal] is not taken in good faith” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 ( see attached order) (VJ) [Entered: 09/19/2014 01:35 PM] 10 Filed Document(s) by Appellant J. Pedro Zarate original copy of Designation of and notice of transcripts filed at Bk.Ct. 9/18/14. (VJ) [Entered: 09/24/2014 09:5 9 24 pg, 619.96 KB 09/24/2014 11 10 pg, 207.19 KB 09/24/2014 12 1 pg, 36.02 KB 09/24/2014 13 268 pg, 6.75 MB 10/22/2014 14 6 pg, 863.96 KB 10/22/2014 15 60 pg, 10.63 MB 10/24/2014 16 37 pg, 684.46 KB 10/29/2014 17 1 pg, 34.14 KB 10/29/2014 18 5 pg, 239.34 KB 11/10/2014 Filed original and copies of Party J. Pedro Zarate's motion extending time to file until 10/20/2014; served on 09/18/2014. (VJ) [Entered: 09/24/2014 10:12 AM] Filed order (Deputy Clerk: vjw) Motion to extend time to file appellant's opening Zarate is GRANTED. Appellant J. Pedro Zarate's opening brief due 10/20/2014 [Entered: 09/24/2014 10:13 AM] ENTRY UPDATED. DOCKETING ERROR - WRONG CASE. --[Edited 09/24/20 09/24/2014 10:58 AM] Filed original and copies of Appellant J. Pedro Zarate's motion for extension of excerpts w/ Declaration in support of motion ; served on. (VJ) [Entered: 10/23/2 Received from Bankruptcy Court copy of Appellant's opening brief and excerpts 10/21/2014. (VJ) [Entered: 10/27/2014 01:01 PM] Filed original and 4 copies, Appellant J. Pedro Zarate's opening brief with five e volume; served on 10/20/2014 ; Appellee Geoffrey Richards and Umpqua Bank 11/10/2014. (VJ) [Entered: 10/27/2014 01:16 PM] Filed order (Deputy Clerk: vjw) Motion to extend time to file appellant's opening Zarate is GRANTED. Appellant J. Pedro Zarate's opening brief received 10/22/ Geoffrey Richards and Umpqua Bank's opening brief due 11/10/2014.; dated: 1 10/29/2014 10:52 AM] Received from Appellant J. Pedro Zarate original and copies of document(s) re appeal. (VJ) [Entered: 10/30/2014 01:59 PM] 19 27 pg, 180.57 KB 11/10/2014 20 15 pg, 279.21 KB 11/24/2014 21 10 pg, 890.6 KB 12/04/2014 22 8 pg, 1.56 MB Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Dana A. Suntag, Esquire for Appellee Geoffrey Richa on 11/10/2014 email - Attorney for Appellees: Suntag, Wiseblood; US mail - Ap (DAS) [Entered: 11/10/2014 03:53 PM] Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. David Marvin Wiseblood, Esquire for Appellee Umpqu served on 11/10/2014 email - Attorney for Appellees: Suntag, Wiseblood; US m 1371] (DMW) [Entered: 11/10/2014 05:29 PM] Filed ( Bk.Ct ) original and 0 copies of Appellant J. Pedro Zarate's reply brief w/ 11/24/2014. (VJ) [Entered: 12/02/2014 03:19 PM] Filed order (PAPPAS and KURTZ); Appellant's IFP Motion is TRANSFERRED the limited purpose of ruling on the IFP motion. No later than 1/5/15, appellant which includes as an exhibit a copy of the district court's order on the IFP motio steps appellant has taken to have the IFP motion considered by the district cou 11:24 AM]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?