United States of America v. Approximately $30,000.00 in U.S. Currency

Filing 5

AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/23/2015 ORDERING 4 that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 4/25/2015.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U. S. Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 2:14-MC-00152-TLN-CKD v. 14 AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE APPROXIMATELY $30,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 15 Defendant 16 17 It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimants Juber Flores- 18 Suarez (“claimants” or “Flores-Suarez”) and Rafael Martinez-Suarez (“claimants” or “Martinez19 Suarez”), by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 20 1. On or about September 29, 2014, claimants Juber Flores-Suarez and Rafael Martinez- 21 Suarez filed claims, in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, with the Drug Enforcement 22 Administration with respect to the Approximately $30,000.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter “defendant 23 currency”), which was seized on June 9, 2014. 24 2. The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit 25 required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any 26 person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person 27 other than the claimant has filed a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the 28 administrative forfeiture proceeding. 29 30 1 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Complaint 3. 1 Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for 2 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant 3 currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative 4 forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of 5 the parties. That deadline was December 26, 2014. 4. 6 By Stipulation and Order filed December 24, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to 7 February 24, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 8 against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is 9 subject to forfeiture. 5. 10 As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further 11 extend to April 25, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for 12 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant 13 currency is subject to forfeiture. 6. 14 Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be 15 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment 16 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to April 25, 2015. 17 Dated: 2/23/15 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 18 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 19 20 21 Dated: 2/23/15 23 /s/ Brett A. Purtzer BRETT A. PURTZER Attorney for Claimants Juber Flores-Suarez & Rafael Martinez-Suarez 24 Authorized via email 22 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: February 23, 2015 27 28 29 30 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 2 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?