United States of America v. Approximately $65,180.00 in U.S. Currency

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/23/2015 ORDERING the United States to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture by 4/23/2015. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U. S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 1 2 3 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. APPROXIMATELY $65,180.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 15 2:14-MC-00153-TLN-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE Defendant. 16 17 It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimant Paul Tuzzolino 18 (“claimant”), by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 19 1. On or about September 25, 2014, claimant filed a claim in the administrative forfeiture 20 proceeding with the Drug Enforcement Administration with respect to the Approximately $65,180.00 in 21 U.S. Currency (hereafter “defendant currency”), which was seized on or about June 10, 2014. 22 2. The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit 23 required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any 24 person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other 25 than claimant has filed a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the administrative 26 forfeiture proceeding. 27 3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for 28 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant 1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time 29 30 1 currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative 2 forfeiture proceeding, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the 3 parties. That deadline was December 24, 2014. 4 4. By Stipulation and Order filed December 24, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to 5 January 23, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 6 against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is 7 subject to forfeiture. 8 5. By Stipulation and Order filed January 27, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend to March 9 24, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the 10 defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to 11 forfeiture. 12 6. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further extend 13 to April 23, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 14 against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is 15 subject to forfeiture. 16 7. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be 17 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment 18 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to April 23, 2015. 19 Dated: 3/23/15 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 20 By: 21 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 22 Dated: 3/23/15 23 /s/ Beorn Zepp BEORN ZEPP Attorney for claimant Paul Tuzzolino 24 (Authorized by email) 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: March 23, 2015 28 29 30 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 2 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?