Elhindi v. State of California et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/21/16 ORDERING the Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 8/28/17 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26. Pretrial statements shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules 281 and 282, and the requirements set forth in the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, ECF No. 19 ; Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 9/25/17 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26; and the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (ECF No. 19 ) is otherwise CONFIRMED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ELSIDDIG ELHINDI, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0009 AC v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA; and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Defendants. 16 This case was referred to the undersigned by order dated August 20, 2015 (ECF No. 15), 17 18 and E.D. Cal. R. 301 (trials by consent). On December 17, 2015, the court issued a Status 19 (Pretrial Scheduling) Order setting this matter for trial on February 21, 2017. ECF No. 19. 20 However, the court’s calendar now precludes that date, and the parties are unable to try the case 21 on any other date before September 2017. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The final pretrial conference, currently scheduled for January 18, 2017, is 24 CONTINUED to Wednesday, August 28, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor. 25 Pretrial statements shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules 281 and 282, and the 26 requirements set forth in the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, ECF No. 19. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 3 4 2. The jury trial, currently scheduled for February 21, 2017, is CONTINUED to Monday, September 25, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor. 3. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (ECF No. 19) is otherwise CONFIRMED. DATED: September 21, 2016 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?