Elhindi v. State of California et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/20/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff Elsiddig A. Elhindi will submit to a medical/psychiatric examination, pursuant to FRCP 35 on 5/18/2017; Dr. Carroll will be designated as Defendant's expert witness and will prepare a report of his findings and conclusions which meet the requirements of FRCP 26(a)(2)(B), 35, and any other applicable rule. Upon receiving the report from Dr. Carroll, Defendant will deliver a copy of the report along with any additional reports regarding the findings of any psychological testing, to Plaintiff's counsel. Defendant will deliver all supplemental reports to Plaintiff's counsel as they become available. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ALAN J. REINACH, State Bar No. 196899 JONATHON s.CHERNE, State Bar No. 281548 Church State Council 2686 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, CA 91361 Tel: (805) 413-7396 Fax: (805) 497-7099 E-mail: ajreinach@churchstate.org E-mail: jcherne@churchstate.org Attorneys for Plaintiff, Elsiddig Elhindi XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California SUSAN E. SLAGER, State Bar No. 162942 Supervising Deputy Attorney General SHANNA M. McDANIEL, State Bar No. 229249 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 322-5318 Fax: (916) 324-5567 E-mail: Shanna.McDaniel@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 2:15-CV-00009-MCE-AC 20 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR MEDICAL EXAMINATION 22 Date: 23 24 May 18, 2017 STATE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT AND Action Filed: January 5, 2015 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MEDICAL EXAMINATION (2:15-CV-00009-MCE-AC) 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Elsiddig Elhindi has testified, under oath, at his deposition, that he has experienced harassment and retaliation at work, based on his Muslim faith, his race, and his 3 Sudanese origin; and 4 WHEREAS, he has also testified that he has experienced extreme and ongoing emotional 5 distress, including post-traumatic stress disorder, as a result of the alleged harassment and 6 7 8 9 10 11 retaliation; and WHEREAS, the Plaintiff agrees to a mental examination of Plaintiff to evaluate his mental condition and the emotional distress he claims to have experienced; NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiff Elsiddig Elhindi will submit to a medical/psychiatric examination, pursuant to 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35, as follows: 13 ' 15 16 Date: Time: 9:30 am Location: MOA Deposition Reporters 1760Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 175 Sacramento, CA 95833 Examining Physician: 14 May 18, 2017 Matthew F. Carroll, MD (CV attached as Exhibit A) 17 18 19 Manner of Examination: 20 1. Dr. Carroll will interview Plaintiff Elhindi about his employment situation, his 21 22 allegations against the defendant, the emotional distress he alleges from his employment 23 situation, his medical, financial, legal, educational, family, marital, and developmental 2 4 background, his habits, his vocational history, and other relevant areas of his life. Plaintiff will 25 not be required to undergo any sort of physical examination, will not be finger printed, and will 26 not be photographed or video-recorded. After the interview, Dr. Carroll will administer the 27 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Test. 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MEDICAL EXAMINATION (2:15-CV-00009-MCE-AC) 1 2 2. Plaintiff will not be required to fill out new patient forms, insurance forms, authorization for records, or arbitration forms prior to the examination and will not be asked to do 3 so by Dr. Carroll. 4 3. The total length of the examination will last approximately five hours exclusive of 5 breaks, depending on various factors, including Plaintiff s cooperation. Dr. Carroll shall not seek 6 7 to uncover any attorney-client privileged information or ask questions that call for a legal 8 conclusion. Plaintiff will be entitled to take reasonable rest or bathroom breaks, if necessary. 9 The on1y persons permitted in the examination session will be Dr. Carroll and Plaintiff; no one 10 else will be allowed to attend or be present. Dr. Carroll will tape record the examination session, 11 but will not provide a copy of the recording to Plaintiff. However, Plaintiff is welcomed to bring 12 his own recording device a:nd record the session for himself. 13 14 15 16 17 18 Report: 1. Dr. Carroll will be designated as Defendant's expert witness and will prepare a report of his findings and conclusions which meet the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B), 35, and any other applicable rule. Upon receiving the report from Dr. Carroll, Defendant will deliver a copy of the report along with any additional reports regarding 19 the findings of any psychological testing, to Plaintiff's counsel. Defendant will deliver all 20 supplemental reports to Plaintiff's counsel as they become available. 21 22 2. The test(s) taken by Plaintiff as part of the mental examination, along with any 23 notes and/or written reports and/or records maintained in any format, including electronic data, 24 are confidential medical records relating to Plaintiff’s mental health. These records are 25 26 confidential and shall not be subject to distribution, without the written authorization of Plaintiff, to anyone except for legal counsel for Defendant, counsel's experts or consultants, and necessary 27 members of counsel's staff, who shall treat these documents as confidential. Said records may be 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MEDICAL EXAMINATION (2:15-CV-00009-MCE-AC) 1 used by defense counsel in preparation for trial, in trial, and in other proceedings by Plaintiff 2 against Defendant, but for no other purpose unrelated to Plaintiff’s litigation(s) against 3 Defendant. At the conclusion of this case, Dr. Carroll will return his entire original file to defense 4 counsel and destroy any of his other remaining copies. 5 Additional Stipulations: 6 7 1. Defendant will transmit a copy of the signed order to Dr. Carroll so that he is 8 aware of the parameters of the agreed-upon examination. Dr. Carroll will not engage in ex parte 9 contact Plaintiff s other health care providers with regard to Plaintiff, although he is entitled to 10 rely upon Plaintiff s lawfully produced medical and health treatment records in preparing his 11 report. Dr. Carroll may ask for identification from Plaintiff but shall not seek to photocopy or 12 record Plaintiff’s government identification. 13 14 15 16 17 2. Dr. Carroll, and/or his staff, shall not engage in ex parte contact with Plaintiff’s Health Care Providers, with regard to Plaintiff. 3. Plaintiff reserves the right to argue that any ·information acquired or learned or any evaluation made in violation of this agreement will not be eyidence for any reason. The parties 18 further agree that the Court may, upon motion at trial, strike, preclude or limit any testimony of 19 the examiner as appropriate and that Plaintiff is not waiving his right to such relief by agreeing to 20 this examination. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MEDICAL EXAMINATION (2:15-CV-00009-MCE-AC) 1 Dated: April 14, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 2 Isl Jonathon S . Cherne 3 JONATHON CHERNE CHURCH STATE COUNCIL 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Elsiddig Elhindi 5 6 7 Dated: April 14, 2017 8 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California SUSAN E. SLAGER Supervising Deputy Attorney General 9 10. Isl J. T.Lindstrom 11 TED LINDSTROM Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 12 13 14 ORDER 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 DATED: April 20, 2017 18 19 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 SA2015102185 Stipulation & Order For Medical Examination.doc 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?