Thompson v. Jones et al
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/7/2015 DISMISSING this action with prejudice. All parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.(Yin, K)
1
2
DAVID ALLEN THOMPSON, SR.
AU 9252
P.O. Box 600
Tracy, CA 95378-0600
3
Plaintiff in Pro Per
4
5
6
7
8
CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP
ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051
Email: rlc@creggerlaw.com
JAROM B. PHIPPS, SBN 296612
Email: jp@creggerlaw.com
1030 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.443-4443
Fax: 916.443-2124
9
Attorneys for Defendants
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
DAVID ALLEN THOMPSON, SR.,
Civil Action No.: 2:15-cv-0011 DAD PC
16
Plaintiff,
17
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER
THEREON
vs.
18
19
SCOTT R. JONES, CAPT. R. PATTISON,
LT. P. MASSA, LT. RICH RIDER, SGT.
KEVIN STEED,
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their
25
attorneys of record that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice
26
pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
27
///
28
CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP.
1030 G St.
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 443-4443
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON
1
1
2
3
DATE: February 23, 2015
/s/ David Allen Thompson, Sr.
DAVID ALLEN THOMPSON SR.
Plaintiff In Pro Per
4
5
6
7
8
9
DATE: February 17, 2015
CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP
10
11
/s/ Robert L. Chalfant
ROBERT L.CHALFANT
Attorney for Defendants
12
13
14
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
15
16
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED. This action against Defendants SHERIFF SCOTT R. JONES,
CAPT. R. PATTISON, LT. P. MASSA, LT. RICH RIDER, and SGT. KEVIN STEED is
dismissed with prejudice. All parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
Dated: April 7, 2015
20
21
22
DAD:10
thom0011.stip.dism
23
24
25
26
27
28
CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP.
1030 G St.
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 443-4443
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?