Maxwell v. Mitchell et al
Filing
72
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING 71 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING defendants Porter and Trostle pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to effect timely service of process; and GRANTING 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY PAUL MAXWELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-CV-0015-JAM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
RYON MITCHELL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
On March 22, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations
23
have been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed March 22, 2021, are adopted in
2.
Defendants Porter and Trostle are dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of
3
full;
4
5
Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to effect timely service of process
6
7
8
3.
The remaining defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 61, is
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
granted; and
9
10
11
12
DATED: April 26, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?