Bos v. United States Small Business Association, et al.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/22/2016 CONTINUING the Scheduling Conference to 2/1/2017 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison; ORDERING the parties to file and serve scheduling conference sta tements pursuant to the 8 Order Setting Status Conference; GRANTING the defendants' Request for Extension of Time to respond to the 5 First Amended Complaint re 13 Proposed Order; ORDERING the defendants to file and serve a response to the 5 First Amended Complaint by 1/9/2017. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TAMARA L. BOS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-CV-0017-JAM-CMK

vs.

ORDER

UNITED STATES SMALL
BUSINESS ASSOCIATION,
et al.,

16

Defendants.

17

/

18

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action.

19

An initial scheduling conference is set for November 30, 2016. A review of the

20

docket reflects that defendants (except “Tammy G.”) have been served (see Docs. 11 and 12),

21

with a response to the amended complaint due by December 5, 2016. Because the time to

22

respond is beyond the current scheduling conference date, the scheduling conference is continued

23

to February 1, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California. The parties

24

shall file and serve scheduling conference statements pursuant to the court’s July 27, 2016, order

25

(see Doc. 8).

26

///
1

1

Defendants have requested an extension of time to January 9, 2017, to file a

2

response to the amended complaint (see Doc. 13-1).1 Good cause appearing therefor, and no

3

prejudice resulting to plaintiff therefrom given the continuance of the scheduling conference

4

discussed above, defendants’ request is granted. Defendants shall file and serve a response to the

5

amended complaint by January 9, 2017.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

DATED: November 22, 2016

9

______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

1

Defendants’ motion states January 9, 2016, which the court presumes is the result
of an understandable typographical error.
2