Brown v. Hagel et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/24/16 ORDERING that the 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Clerk to send plaintiff 1 USM form, 1 summons, copy of complaint, scheduling order and the forms providing notice of the magistr ate judges availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes; within 14 days, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM and file a statement to the court regarding the submission; USM shall serve process within 90 days and within 14 days thereafter file a statement that said documents have been served. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KEITH BROWN, 11 12 13 No. 2:15-cv-0026-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CHUCK HAGEL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff has requested authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, 17 and has submitted the affidavit required thereunder which demonstrates that plaintiff is unable to 18 prepay fees and costs or give security for them.1 ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed 19 in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court is directed to dismiss a case filed pursuant to 21 the in forma pauperis statute if, at any time, it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, 22 or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or 23 seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. The court cannot make this determination on 24 the present record. Therefore, the court reserves decision on these issues until the record is 25 sufficiently developed. 26 27 28 1 This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 1 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is granted. 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal 4 Rule of Civil Procedure 4. 5 3. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a copy of 6 the complaint, this court’s scheduling order, and the forms providing notice of the magistrate 7 judge’s availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes. 8 4. Plaintiff is advised that the U.S. Marshal will require: 9 a. One completed summons; 10 b. One completed USM-285 form for defendant; 11 c. A copy of the complaint for defendant, with an extra copy for the U.S. Marshal; 12 and, 13 d. A copy of this court’s scheduling order and related documents for defendant. 14 5. Plaintiff shall supply the United States Marshal, within 14 days from the date this order 15 is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall, within 14 16 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the 17 United States Marshal. 18 6. The U.S. Marshal shall serve process, with copies of this court’s scheduling order and 19 related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff, without 20 prepayment of costs. The United States Marshal shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement 21 with the court that said documents have been served. If the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any 22 reason, to effect service of process on any defendant, the Marshal shall promptly report that fact, 23 and the reasons for it, to the undersigned. 24 7. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal, 501 25 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 (tel. 916-930-2030). 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 2 1 8. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be 2 dismissed. 3 DATED: March 24, 2016. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?