Maxum Investments, LP v. Mlivic et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/6/15: The action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court. The Clerk of Court shall serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the Sacramento County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (14UD06730) in the proof of service. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAXUM INVESTMENTS, LP, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-29-KJM-KJN PS v. ORDER MIRELA MLIVIC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On January 8, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17 18 4), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 20 filed. 21 Therefore, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct and decides the matter 22 on the applicable law. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The 23 magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified 24 School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court 25 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are ADOPTED. 28 2. The action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court. 1 1 3. The Clerk of Court shall serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the 2 Sacramento County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (14UD06730) in the 3 proof of service. 4 5 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. DATED: February 6, 2015. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?