Natural Fashions, Inc. v. Best of Kashmir

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 06/26/15 ORDERING that the 18 Motion for a Continuance is DENIED as unnecessary and the hearing on the 19 Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default is CONTINUED to 07/29/2015 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATURAL FASHIONS, INC., 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-CV-0033-MCE-CMK Plaintiff, vs. ORDER BEST OF KASHMIR, et al., Defendants. / 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action alleging 18 copyright infringement. Pending before the court are: (1) defendants’ motion to continue hearing 19 (Doc. 18); and (2) defendants’ motion to set aside entry of default (Doc. 19). 20 Defendants seek a continuance on plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 14) for entry of default 21 judgment. Defendants’ motion is denied as unnecessary in light of the court’s June 23, 2015, 22 order vacating the hearing and submitting the matter on the record without oral argument. 23 Defendants have noticed a motion to set aside defaults entered by the Clerk of the 24 Court on February 25, 2015, for hearing on July 20, 2015. That matter is continued to the court’s 25 regular law and motion calendar on July 29, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in 26 Redding, California. The parties may appear telephonically through CourtCall. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Defendants’ motion (Doc. 18) for a continuance is denied as unnecessary; 2. The hearing on defendants’ motion to set aside entry of default is 3 4 5 and continued to July 29, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Redding, California. 6 7 8 9 DATED: June 26, 2015 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?