Natural Fashions, Inc. v. Best of Kashmir
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/19/2016 finding that the time to file a Motion under F.R.Cv.P. Rule 60(b) re 33 USCA Order has expired; ORDERING the defendants to file their opening brief in the Ninth Circuit within seven (7) days. (cc: Appeals Court - Ninth Circuit) (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NATURAL FASHIONS, INC.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-00033-MCE-CMK
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
BEST OF KASHMIR, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
This is a copyright infringement case in which the Court entered a default
18
judgment on March 30, 2016. ECF Nos. 25, 26. Defendants filed a Notice of Appeal on
19
April 28, 2016, and then filed a Motion for Reconsideration on May 2, 2016. ECF Nos.
20
27, 29. Because of the pendency of the appeal, the Court lacked jurisdiction over the
21
Motion for Reconsideration. ECF No. 30 at 2. The Court nonetheless indicated its
22
willingness to hear a Rule 60(b) motion, allowed Defendants to apply to the Ninth Circuit
23
for a limited remand, and specifically ordered Defendants to file their “Rule 60(b) motion
24
not later than twenty (20) days after the remand order is filed or the motion will be
25
summarily denied.” Id. at 3.
26
Although the Ninth Circuit issued its limited remand order on June 24, 2016,
27
Defendants have declined to file a Rule 60(b) motion for this Court’s consideration.
28
Accordingly, Defendants have failed to comply with this Court’s deadline for filing a
1
1
Rule 60(b) motion. There being nothing for the Court to consider, Defendants are
2
HEREBY ORDERED to file their opening brief in the Ninth Circuit within seven (7) days
3
from the date this order is electronically filed in accordance with that court’s order. ECF
4
No. 33.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 19, 2016
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?