Strain v. GC Services Limited Partnership

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/12/15. A Status Conference is set for 4/16/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Joint Status Report due 14 days prior to conference. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREG STRAIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0056 KJN v. ORDER GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 16 Defendant. 17 On February 11, 2015, after all parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States 18 19 Magistrate Judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (ECF Nos. 6, 7), the action was 20 reassigned to the undersigned for all further proceedings and the entry of final judgment. (ECF 21 No. 8.) 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. A status (pre-trial scheduling) conference is set for Thursday April 16, 2015, at 10:00 24 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25 before the undersigned. All parties shall appear by counsel 25 or in person if acting without counsel. 26 2. Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference, the parties shall file a 27 joint status report briefly describing the case and addressing the following: (a) service 28 of process; (b) possible joinder of additional parties; (c) any expected or desired 1 1 amendment of the pleadings; (d) jurisdiction and venue; (e) anticipated motions and 2 their scheduling; (f) the report required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 outlining the proposed 3 discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses; (g) future 4 proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and law and 5 motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial; (h) special procedures, if 6 any; (i) estimated trial time; (j) modifications of standard pretrial procedures due to the 7 simplicity or complexity of the proceedings; (k) whether the case is related to any 8 other cases, including bankruptcy; (l) whether a settlement conference should be 9 scheduled, including whether the parties desire an early settlement conference; (m) 10 whether counsel will stipulate to the undersigned acting as settlement judge and waive 11 disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they would prefer to have a 12 settlement conference conducted before another judge; (n) whether the case should be 13 briefly stayed and referred to the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program 14 (“VDRP”) before further significant litigation expenses are incurred; and (o) any other 15 matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter. 16 3. The parties and counsel are cautioned that failure to obey the Federal Rules of Civil 17 Procedure, this court’s Local Rules, or an order of this court may result in dismissal of 18 the action, a default judgment, or any other appropriate sanctions. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 12, 2015 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?