Cervantes v. Stockton Unified School District
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/22/2015 CONTINUING the Settlement Conference to 4/28/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Michel, G.)
1 Jonathan H. Siegel (SBN 78143)
Benjamin J. Siegel (SBN 256260)
2 SIEGEL LEWITTER MALKANI
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 307
3 Oakland, California 94612
Phone: 510-452-5000
4 Fax: 510-452-5004
jsiegel@sl-employmentlaw.com
5 bsiegel@sl-employmentlaw.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff LILY CERVANTES
7 James T. Anwyl (SBN 78715)
Lynn A. Garcia (SBN 131196)
8 Alexandra M. Asterlin (SBN 221286)
ANWYL & STEPP, LLP
9 PO Box 269127
Sacramento, CA 95826
10 Phone: (916) 565-1800
Fax: (916) 565-2374
11 jtanwyl@anwylaw.com
lag@anwylaw.com
12 aasterlin@anwylaw.com
13 Attorneys for Defendant STOCKTON
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
14
15
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
22
23
Siegel
LeWitter
24
Malkani
1939 Harrison St.
Suite 307
Oakland, CA 94612
510-452-5000
510-452-5004 (fax)
25
26
) Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC
)
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST AND
) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
v.
) SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT )
)
and DOES I through XX, inclusive,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
LILY CERVANTES
27
///
28
///
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC
1
Plaintiff Lily Cervantes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Stockton Unified School District.
2
(“Defendant”), collectively (“the Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel,
3
hereby stipulate and jointly request that the settlement conference be moved to April 28, 2016 at
4
9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor, before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire.
5
The settlement conference is currently scheduled for January 7, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. in
6
Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor, before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The parties have conferred
7
and believe that a settlement conference at a later date, after further discovery is completed, is
8
more likely to be productive and possibly lead to settlement. Based on that joint understanding,
9
plaintiff’s counsel Benjamin Siegel contacted Magistrate Claire’s courtroom deputy, Valerie
10
Callen, to request that the settlement conference be moved. On December 10, 2016, Ms. Callen
11
confirmed that the settlement conference could be moved to April 28, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., and that
12
she would hold this date until the parties submitted a joint stipulation formally requesting that it
13
moved to this date and time.
14
Accordingly, the Parties hereby jointly stipulate and request that the settlement conference
15
be moved to April 28, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor, before Magistrate Judge
16
Allison Claire.
17
18
DATED:
December 22, 2015
SIEGEL LEWITTER MALKANI
19
By:
20
21
Attorneys for Plaintiff
22
23
Siegel
LeWitter
24 DATED: December 22, 2015
Malkani
1939 Harrison St.
Suite 307
Oakland, CA 94612
510-452-5000
510-452-5004 (fax)
25
26
27
/s/ Benjamin J. Siegel
Jonathan H. Siegel
Benjamin J. Siegel
ANWYL & STEPP, LLP
By:
/s/ James Anwyl (as authorized on 12/16/15)
James Anwyl
Lynn A. Garcia
Attorneys for Defendant
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
DATED: December 22, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Siegel
LeWitter
24
Malkani
1939 Harrison St.
Suite 307
Oakland, CA 94612
510-452-5000
510-452-5004 (fax)
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?