Cervantes v. Stockton Unified School District

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/22/2015 CONTINUING the Settlement Conference to 4/28/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 Jonathan H. Siegel (SBN 78143) Benjamin J. Siegel (SBN 256260) 2 SIEGEL LEWITTER MALKANI 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 307 3 Oakland, California 94612 Phone: 510-452-5000 4 Fax: 510-452-5004 jsiegel@sl-employmentlaw.com 5 bsiegel@sl-employmentlaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff LILY CERVANTES 7 James T. Anwyl (SBN 78715) Lynn A. Garcia (SBN 131196) 8 Alexandra M. Asterlin (SBN 221286) ANWYL & STEPP, LLP 9 PO Box 269127 Sacramento, CA 95826 10 Phone: (916) 565-1800 Fax: (916) 565-2374 11 jtanwyl@anwylaw.com lag@anwylaw.com 12 aasterlin@anwylaw.com 13 Attorneys for Defendant STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 14 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 22 23 Siegel LeWitter 24 Malkani 1939 Harrison St. Suite 307 Oakland, CA 94612 510-452-5000 510-452-5004 (fax) 25 26 ) Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC ) ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST AND ) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE v. ) SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ) ) and DOES I through XX, inclusive, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) LILY CERVANTES 27 /// 28 /// 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC 1 Plaintiff Lily Cervantes (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Stockton Unified School District. 2 (“Defendant”), collectively (“the Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, 3 hereby stipulate and jointly request that the settlement conference be moved to April 28, 2016 at 4 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor, before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. 5 The settlement conference is currently scheduled for January 7, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. in 6 Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor, before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The parties have conferred 7 and believe that a settlement conference at a later date, after further discovery is completed, is 8 more likely to be productive and possibly lead to settlement. Based on that joint understanding, 9 plaintiff’s counsel Benjamin Siegel contacted Magistrate Claire’s courtroom deputy, Valerie 10 Callen, to request that the settlement conference be moved. On December 10, 2016, Ms. Callen 11 confirmed that the settlement conference could be moved to April 28, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., and that 12 she would hold this date until the parties submitted a joint stipulation formally requesting that it 13 moved to this date and time. 14 Accordingly, the Parties hereby jointly stipulate and request that the settlement conference 15 be moved to April 28, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor, before Magistrate Judge 16 Allison Claire. 17 18 DATED: December 22, 2015 SIEGEL LEWITTER MALKANI 19 By: 20 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff 22 23 Siegel LeWitter 24 DATED: December 22, 2015 Malkani 1939 Harrison St. Suite 307 Oakland, CA 94612 510-452-5000 510-452-5004 (fax) 25 26 27 /s/ Benjamin J. Siegel Jonathan H. Siegel Benjamin J. Siegel ANWYL & STEPP, LLP By: /s/ James Anwyl (as authorized on 12/16/15) James Anwyl Lynn A. Garcia Attorneys for Defendant 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED: December 22, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Siegel LeWitter 24 Malkani 1939 Harrison St. Suite 307 Oakland, CA 94612 510-452-5000 510-452-5004 (fax) 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 2:15-cv-00060-KJM-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?