Williams v. Valenzuela
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2015 TRANSFERRING this matter to the USDC for the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONALD B. WILLIAMS,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0063 CKD P
v.
ORDER
E. VALENZUELA,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or submitted a request
19
to proceed in forma pauperis.
Petitioner is incarcerated in California Men’s Colony and was convicted in Los Angeles
20
21
County. Both California Men’s Colony and Los Angeles County are in an area embraced by the
22
United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of
23
24
confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state
25
prisoners. Because petitioner was not convicted in this district, and is not presently confined
26
here, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the application.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is
2
transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C.
3
§2241(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
4
Dated: January 22, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2/kly
will0063.108b
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?