Jackson v. San Joaquin County et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/8/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's request (ECF No. 12) is denied. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALICIA JACKSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0065 JAM CKD PS

v.

ORDER

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

17
18

Defendants’ motion to dismiss was originally noticed to be heard on June 24, 2015. Because no

19

opposition was filed, the matter was continued to July 8, 2015 and plaintiff was directed to file

20

opposition no later than June 19, 2015. Plaintiff again failed to timely file opposition. The

21

motion was therefore submitted on the papers and findings and recommendations were filed

22

recommending dismissal of the action.
After the findings and recommendations were filed, plaintiff requested continuance of the

23
24

hearing. Plaintiff still has filed no opposition and has filed no objections to the findings and

25

recommendations.

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request (ECF No. 12) is denied.
Dated: July 8, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3
4
5

4 jackson0065.req

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2