Barger v. CDCR et al

Filing 20

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/22/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GARY DALE BARGER,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-0073 KJM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CDCR, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed May 19, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to pay the appropriate filing fees

18

within twenty-one days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation

19

that this action be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

20

paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

21

be dismissed without prejudice.

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

25

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

26

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

27

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

28

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
1

1

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

2

Dated: June 22, 2015

3
4
/barg0073.fifp

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2