Barger v. CDCR
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2015 DISMISSING plaintiff's 2 application to proceed IFP, without prejudice; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days a completed application to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GARY DALE BARGER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0086 CKD P
v.
ORDER
CDCR,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28
19
U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma
20
pauperis on the form used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application will be dismissed
21
and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form.
22
Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account
23
statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint.
24
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is dismissed without
26
27
28
prejudice;
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In
Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and
1
1
3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed
2
application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result
3
in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
4
Dated: January 22, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2/kly
barg0086.3d
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?