Callison v. City of American Canyon et al
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/5/15 ORDERING that plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint in this action. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
James A. Du Charme (SBN 61002)
DU CHARME & COHEN
610Tisdale Avenue – Mare Island
Vallejo, CA 94592-1123
707 556 3099
888 688 4170 (e-fax)
jducharme@pacbell.net
Attorney for Plaintiff Timothy M. Callison
Claudia M. Quintana SBN 178613
Furah Z. Faruqui SBN 233083
Office of the City Attorney,
555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068
Vallejo, CA 94590
Tel: (707) 648-4545
Fax: (707) 648-4687
Furah.Faruqui@cityofvallejo.net
Attorney for Defendant City of Vallejo
Dale L. Allen, Jr. SBN 145279
Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood and Werth
180 Montgomery St Ste 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
415 697-3456
415 813 2045
dallen@aghwlaw.com
Attorney for Defendant County of Napa,
City of American Canyon, Officer Schneider
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
TIMOTHY M. CALLISON,
21
22
Plaintiff,
vs.
23
24
25
CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, CITY OF
VALLEJO, COUNTY OF NAPA, OFFICER
SCHNEIDER, AND
DOES 1 – 100, INCLUSIVE;
26
Defendants.
27
28
Case No: 2:15-cv-00116 –WBS-KJN
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:15-CV-00116-WBS-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Courtroom: 5 Judge William B. Shubb
ACTION FILED: October 9, 2014
DATE REMOVED: January 15, 2015
TRIAL DATE: August 9, 2016
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Page 1
1
1.
The parties, Plaintiff Timothy M. Callison and Defendants City of American Canyon,
2
City of Vallejo, County of Napa and Officer Brett Schneider, by and through their designated counsel,
3
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) hereby jointly stipulate and request that the Court
4
grant Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint in this action, a true and correct copy of which is
5
attached as Exhibit A hereto.
6
2.
Plaintiff filed his complaint on October 9, 2014, in Solano County Superior Court;
7
3.
On January 15, 2015, Defendants removed plaintiff’s complaint to the Eastern District of
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
California;
4.
On January 22, 2015, Defendants, respectively, filed their Answers to Plaintiff’s
complaint;
5.
In response to Interrogatories Plaintiff recently learned that the medical provider at the
Napa County Correctional Facility is a third party vendor, California Forensic Medical Group.
6.
Until recent discussion between plaintiff’s counsel and Adam Abel, former counsel for
defendant Napa County, neither counsel had been aware of California Forensic Medical Group (CFMG).
The parties had been under the impression that medical care within the Napa County jail was provided
15
16
by Napa County employees.
Responses to Interrogatories confirmed the identity of CFMG and
subsequent communications amongst counsel produced the consensus, given the allegations in
17
Plaintiff’s complaint, that good cause exists for Plaintiff to amend his complaint and add CFMG as a
18
defendant.
19
7.
Defendants waive notice and service of the First Amended Complaint and shall not be
20
required to answer the amendment, but each of the aforementioned parties has the option to either 1) file
21
a responsive pleading (within two weeks of the First Amended Complaint being filed), or 2) elect to
22
treat all of that party’s denials, responses, and affirmative defenses contained in the applicable Answer
23
24
filed herein as responsive to the First Amended Complaint.
8.
Concurrent with this stipulation for leave for Plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint,
25
the parties, by and through their counsel, are filing their joint “Stipulation to Alter / Vacate Pretrial
26
Scheduling Order” therein requesting a new pretrial scheduling conference.
27
28
Case No: 2:15-cv-00116 –WBS-KJN
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Page 2
1
2
9.
The parties have met and conferred regarding the allegations contained in plaintiff’s
proposed First Amended Complaint
3
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court grant plaintiff
4
leave to file a First Amended Complaint in this action, a true and correct copy of which is attached as
5
Exhibit A hereto.
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8
DATED: November 4, 2015
9
10
11
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Furah Z. Faruqui
FURAH Z. FARUQUI
Deputy City Attorney
Attorney for Defendant,
CITY OF VALLEJO,
12
13
DATED: November 4, 2015
14
15
/s/ James A. Du Charme
JAMES A. DU CHARME
DU CHARME & COHEN
Attorney for Plaintiff,
TIMOTHY M. CALLISON
16
17
DATED: November 4, 2015
18
19
20
/s/ Dale L. Allen ___
DALE L. ALLEN
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH
Attorney for Defendants,
COUNTY OF NAPA, CITY OF AMERICAN
CANYON AND OFFICER SCHNEIDER
21
I hereby attest / certify that I have been authorized by the above named counsel, Dale L. Allen
22
23
24
and Furah Z. Faruqui, to file this JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Executed on this 4th day of November, 2015, at Vallejo, California.
25
__________________________
James A. Du Charme
26
27
28
Case No: 2:15-cv-00116 –WBS-KJN
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Page 3
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
4
Dated: November 5, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No: 2:15-cv-00116 –WBS-KJN
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?