Callison v. City of American Canyon et al
Filing
32
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/19/16 ORDERING that the 12/23/16 hearing on 27 defendants' Motion to Compel is VACATED; within 7 days, plaintiff's counsel shall SHOW CAUSE in writing as to why defendants' 27 motion should not be granted, as well as good cause for failing to file a timely response to defendants' motion. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY M. CALLISON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-0116 WBS DB
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON; CITY
OF VALLEJO; COUNTY OF NAPA;
OFFICER BRETT SCHNEIDER; and
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP,
17
Defendants.
18
On December 2, 2016, defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiff’s deposition and
19
20
noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on December 23, 2016, in compliance with
21
Local Rule 302(c)(1). Defendants’ motion alleges that plaintiff has repeatedly failed to appear for
22
noticed depositions and seeks an order compelling plaintiff to appear for a deposition and to pay
23
$4,674.05 in sanctions. (ECF No. 28 at 1.) Pursuant to Local Rule 251(e), plaintiff’s counsel was
24
to file a response to defendants’ motion on or before December 16, 2016. Plaintiff’s counsel,
25
however, has failed to file a timely response to defendants’ motion.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1) The December 23, 2016 hearing of defendants’ motion to compel (ECF No. 27) is
3
vacated; and
4
2) Within seven (7) days of the date of this order, plaintiff’s counsel shall show cause in
5
writing as to why defendants’ motion should not be granted, as well as good cause for failing to
6
file a timely response to defendants’ motion.
7
Dated: December 19, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\callison0116.osc
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?