Rogers v Duffy
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/11/15 ORDERING that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL D. ROGERS,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0123 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WARDEN DUFFY,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. By order filed January 21, 2015,
18
plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file a certified copy of his prison trust account
19
statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. On January
20
29, 2015, and February 6, 2015, plaintiff filed responses claiming that he believed the prison trust
21
account office sent the certified trust account statement to the Northern District. (ECF Nos. 11,
22
12.) However, the court has checked the records for the Northern District through CM/ECF, and
23
the only case of record for plaintiff was terminated on December 16, 2013, and no trust account
24
statement was recently filed therein. (Case No. 3:13-cv-2567.) Therefore, plaintiff will be
25
provided an extension of time to submit the certified copy of his prison trust account statement to
26
this court.
27
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date
of this order to file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period
1
1
immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order
2
will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
3
Dated: February 11, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
/roge0123.36
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?