DuShane v. Sacramento County Main Jail et al
Filing
67
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/4/16 ORDERING that Plaintiffs time to file his opposition to Defendants motion for summary judgment may be extended by 28 days, up to and including May 5, 2016, and that Defe ndants time to file any reply to Plaintiffs opposition may be extended by 28 days, up to and including May 19, 2016. There has been one previous stipulation for an extension of 28 days 63 , when Plaintiff was still proceeding in pro per.(Dillon, M)
1
4
James V. Weixel (Bar No. 166024)
WEIXEL LAW OFFICE
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone:
(415) 691-7495
Facsimile:
(866) 640-3918
Email:
appeals@jimweixel.com
5
Attorney for Plaintiff JASEN LYNN DUSHANE
6
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
Van Longyear, CSB No. 84189
Peter C. Zilaff, CSB No. 272658
Nicole M. Rippy, CSB No. 287165
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Phone: 916-974-8500
Facsimile: 916-974-8510
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant DEPUTY HER
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
16
17
JASEN LYNN DUSHANE,
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
21
SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL,
DEPUTY HER,
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:15-cv-0136-TLN-EFB P
Hon. Edmund F. Brennan, U.S. Magistrate Judge
---------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME RE SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiff JASEN LYNN DUSHANE and Defendant
JOHNNY HER, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
26
1.
Plaintiff’s counsel, James V. Weixel, Esq., was recently appointed to represent Plaintiff in
27
this action and in three other actions filed by Plaintiff on a limited-purpose basis.
28
///
1
___________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE
DuShane v. Sac. Co. Main Jail, et al. – No. 2:15-cv-0136-TLN-EFB P
1
2
3
2.
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is currently due on
April 7, 2016. Defendant’s reply, if any, will be due on April 21, 2016.
3.
The parties recognize that Mr. Weixel will require some time to familiarize himself with
4
the pleadings and discovery in this matter before being able to prepare a meaningful opposition. The
5
parties have also discussed resolution possibilities, and agree that it would be appropriate to engage in
6
settlement efforts before Plaintiff is required to prepare an opposition and Defendant is required to reply.
7
4.
In light of the foregoing considerations, the parties stipulate and agree that Plaintiff’s time
8
to file his opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment may be extended by 28 days, up to
9
and including May 5, 2016, and that Defendant’s time to file any reply to Plaintiff’s opposition may be
10
extended by 28 days, up to and including May 19, 2016. There has been one previous stipulation for an
11
extension of 28 days (ECF 63), when Plaintiff was still proceeding in pro per.
12
13
14
5.
The parties respectfully request that the Court enter the order below according to the
terms of this stipulation.
WEIXEL LAW OFFICE
Dated: March 31, 2016.
15
By:
16
/s/ James V. Weixel___________________
James V. Weixel
Attorney for Plaintiff JASEN LYNN DUSHANE
17
18
19
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
Dated: March 31, 2016.
20
21
By:
_/s/ Peter C. Zilaff (as authorized on 3/31/2016)
Peter C. Zilaff
22
Attorneys for Defendant DEPUTY HER
23
ORDER
24
25
Pursuant to the terms of the stipulation above, IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
April 4
Dated: _____________, 2016.
_________________________________________
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
___________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE
DuShane v. Sac. Co. Main Jail, et al. – No. 2:15-cv-0136-TLN-EFB P
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?