Reyes v. California Department of Corrections et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/15/2015 DISMISSING withiout prejudice defendants Daily, Reed, Dr. Ho, Dr. Ross, Mr. Johnson, and Dr. Kitt; and DISMISSING without prejudice claims against defendant Fredrickson, based on the June 12 and 16, 2014 incidents.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHANE MYRON REYES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
No. 2:15-cv-0140 KJN P
LVN Bello, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff consented to proceed
18
before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed May 14, 2015,
19
plaintiff’s claims against defendants Dailey, Reed, Fredrickson (for June 12 and 16, 2014
20
incidents), Dr. Ho, Dr. Ross, Mr. Johnson, and Dr. Kitt, were dismissed with leave to amend.
21
Plaintiff was granted the option to consent to dismiss such claims and proceed on the amended
22
complaint or to file a second amended complaint to attempt to state cognizable claims against
23
those defendants. On June 3, 2015, plaintiff filed a notice in which he consented to the dismissal
24
of defendants Dailey, Reed, Fredrickson (for June 12 and 16, 2014 incidents), Dr. Ho, Dr. Ross,
25
Mr. Johnson, and Dr. Kitt, without prejudice. (ECF No. 33.)
26
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. Defendants Dailey, Reed, Dr. Ho, Dr. Ross, Mr. Johnson, and Dr. Kitt, are dismissed
28
without prejudice; and
1
2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Fredrickson, based on the June 12 and 16, 2014
1
2
incidents,1 are dismissed without prejudice.
3
Dated: June 15, 2015
4
5
6
7
/reye0140.dsm
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Fredrickson based on the June 23, 2014 incident were
found to state a potentially cognizable civil rights claim (ECF No. 32 at 10), and such claims are
not dismissed by this order.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?