Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Syngen Inc et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/24/15 ORDERING that Defendants shall have to and including May 26, 2015, to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mary E. McCutcheon (State Bar No. 099939)
mmccutcheon@fbm.com
Tyler C. Gerking (State Bar No. 222088)
tgerking@fbm.com
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 954-4400
Facsimile: (415) 954-4480
Attorneys for Defendant
SYNGEN, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,
an Ohio corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 2:15-cv-00142-JAM-DA
STIPULATION FOR SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND ORDER (L.R. 144)
v.
14
15
16
17
SYNGEN, INC., a California corporation,
PHILIP COELHO, an individual, PRINCE
EMMANUEL, an individual, and
TERRENCE WOLF, an individual,
Complaint filed:
Complaint served:
Current response date:
New response date:
January 16, 2015
February 6, 2015
April 28, 2015
May 26, 2015
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants
20
SYNGEN, INC., PHILIP COELHO, PRINCE EMMANUEL, and TERRENCE WOLF
21
(“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
22
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action;
23
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2015, Plaintiff served Defendants with a copy of the
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 954-4400
Complaint and Summons in a Civil Action;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), Defendants initially
needed to file and serve a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before April 7, 2015;
WHEREAS, on April 3, 2015, the parties stipulated to an initial 21-day extension of time
for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to and including April 28, 2015 pursuant to
STIP FOR 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT & PROPOSED
ORDER -- 2:15-CV-00142-JAM-DA
30924\4852462.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Civil Local Rule 144;
WHEREAS, the parties are now engaged in negotiations that, if successful, could lead to
an interim resolution of all issues raised in Plaintiff’s Complaint;
WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the
Complaint by an additional 28 days to determine if an interim resolution can be achieved;
WHEREAS, this is the parties’ second stipulation to extend the deadline for Defendants to
respond to the Complaint;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE THAT
Defendants shall have to and including May 26, 2015, to move, answer, or otherwise respond to
Plaintiff’s Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
Dated: April 23, 2015
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
13
I represent that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been
obtained from the other signatory,
which shall serve in lieu of his
signature on this document.
By: /s/ Tyler C. Gerking
Tyler C. Gerking
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant
SYNGEN, INC.
16
17
18
Dated: April 23, 2015
KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK, LLP
19
20
By: /s/ Louis H. Castoria
Louis H. Castoria
21
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
22
23
24
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
25
26
Dated: 4/24/2015
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 954-4400
STIP FOR 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT & PROPOSED
ORDER -- 2:15-CV-00142-JAM-DA
-2-
30924\4852462.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?