Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Syngen Inc et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/31/2017 ORDERING In accordance with Local Rule 144(a), Scottsdale and SynGen, by and through their respective counsel, agree that SynGen shall file its responsive pleading in this matter no later than 9/22/2017. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

KAUFMAN DOLOWICH VOLUCK, LLP
Louis H. Castoria (SBN 95768)
[e-mail]
425 California Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC
Keith A. Little (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Sabrina Haurin (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
10 West Broad Street, Suite 2100
Columbus, Ohio 43215-3422
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
Mary E. McCutcheon (SBN 099939)
[e-mail]
Tyler C. Gerking (SBN 222088)
[e-mail]
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
SYNGEN, INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

15

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,
an Ohio corporation,

16
Plaintiff,
17

Case No. 2:15-cv-00142-JAM-DA
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

v.
18
SYNGEN, INC.,
19
Defendant.
20
21

Plaintiff SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY (“Scottsdale”) and Defendant

22

SYNGEN, INC. (“SynGen”) by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree

23

as follows:

24

1.

On January 16, 2015, Scottsdale filed a Complaint against SynGen.

25

2.

On October 28, 2015, the Court dismissed Scottsdale’s First Cause of Action with

26

prejudice and stayed its Second Cause of Action pending final resolution of the underlying

27

litigation at issue in this insurance coverage matter.

28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

3.

The underlying litigation was dismissed with prejudice on July 13, 2017.

JOINT STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00142-JAM-DA

30924\6169288.1

1
2
3
4
5

3.

On August 15, 2017, the Court issued a Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order for this

matter. This Order did not set a deadline for the filing of responsive pleadings.
4.

On August 30, 2017, Scottsdale voluntarily dismissed without prejudice the

individual defendants from this action.
5.

In accordance with Local Rule 144(a), Scottsdale and SynGen, by and through

6

their respective counsel, agree that SynGen shall file its responsive pleading in this matter no later

7

than September 22, 2017.

8
9

Dated: August 31, 2017

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
Mary E. McCutcheon
Tyler C. Gerking
Amanda D. Hairston

10
11
12

By: /s/ Amanda A. Hairston
Amanda A. Hairston

13

Attorneys for Defendant
SYNGEN, INC.

14
15
16

Dated: August 31, 2017

KAUFMAN DOLOWICH VOLUCK, LLP
Louis H. Castoria

17

BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC
Keith A. Little
Sabrina Haurin

18
19
20

By: /s/ Sabrina Haurin (as authorized on Aug 30, 2017)
Sabrina Haurin

21

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY

22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
24
25

Dated: 8/31/2017

/s/ John A. Mendez____________________

26
United States District Court Judge
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

JOINT STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00142-JAM-DA

-2-

30924\6169288.1