Johnson v. Sammy's Restaurant, Inc.
Filing
69
ORDER ADOPTING 67 Findings and Recommendations in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/04/23 DENYING 62 Motion for Default Judgment, DISMISSING Plaintiff's claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act and DECLINING to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-147-TLN-KJN
ORDER
v.
SAMMY”S RESTAURANT, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
On October 31, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No.
17
18
67), which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the
19
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On November 7, 2023,
20
Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 68), which the Court
21
reviewed.
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
22
23
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
24
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
25
the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
the magistrate judge’s analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 67) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 62) is DENIED;
4
3. Plaintiff’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act is DISMISSED as
5
6
7
8
9
moot;
4. The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining
state law claims; and
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Date: December 4, 2023
10
11
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?