Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/11/2016 AWARDING Plaintiff Alisha Bailey attorney fees in the amount of TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($2,900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Young Cho Attorney at Law: 189870 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Alisha Bailey 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 ALISHA BAILEY, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:15-cv-00153-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 19 20 21 TO THE HONORABLE CRAIG M. KELLISON, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their 23 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Alisha Bailey be 24 awarded attorney fees in the amount of two thousand nine hundred dollars 25 ($2,900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 26 This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of -1- 1 Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 2 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). 3 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Alisha Bailey, the 4 government will consider the matter of Alisha Bailey's assignment of EAJA fees to 5 Young Cho. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability 6 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset 7 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. 8 After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether 9 they are subject to any offset. 10 Fees shall be made payable to Alisha Bailey, but if the Department of the 11 Treasury determines that Alisha Bailey does not owe a federal debt, then the 12 government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made 13 directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment 14 executed by Alisha Bailey. United States v. $186,416.00, 722 F.3d 1173, 1176 15 (9th Cir. 2013) ($186,416.00 II) (ordering fees paid to counsel because of an 16 assignment that did not interfere with a raised superior lien).1 Any payments made 17 shall be delivered to Young Cho. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 The Commissioner does not stipulate to the citation of $186,416.00 II, and will not participate in representing to this Court that it carries legal import in these proceedings. $186,416 II involved a different statute and very different factual circumstances than those presented here, or in other Social Security cases. Because the parties have agreed to the payment of EAJA fees, and the amount, and to avoid motion practice solely related to Plaintiff’s citation, the Commissioner agrees to this stipulation. The Commissioner reserves the right to challenge the applicability of $186,416 II to any Social Security case, and this Stipulation should not be construed as a waiver of such reservation. Alisha Bailey contends that U.S. v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency, 642 F.3d 753, 757 (9th Cir. 2011) ($186,416.00 I) held that there is no functional difference between the CAFRA and EAJA in terms of “ownership” of the fee. U.S. v. Kim, -2- 1 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Alisha Bailey's 2 request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on 3 the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount 4 shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Alisha 5 Bailey and/or Young Cho including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may 6 have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 7 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Young Cho and/or the Law 8 Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 9 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. 10 DATE: May 9, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 11 /s/ Young Cho BY: __________________ Young Cho Attorney for plaintiff Alisha Bailey 12 13 14 15 16 17 Respectfully submitted, DATE: May 9, 2016 PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney /s/ Theophous H. Reagans 18 19 20 21 THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) 22 23 24 25 26 797 F.3d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 2015) holds that the Anti-Assignment Act invalidates an assignment but does not preclude the attorney from gaining an interest in the fees. -3- ORDER 1 2 Approved and so ordered: 3 4 Dated: May 11, 2016 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -4- 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 I am employed in the county of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over 4 the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 12631 5 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115, Santa Fe Springs, California 90670. 6 On this day of May 9, 2016, I served the foregoing document described as 7 STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES 8 AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 9 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 on the 10 interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed 11 envelope addressed as follows: 12 Ms. Alisha Bailey P.O. Box 792 Palo Cedro, CA 96073 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I caused such envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail at Santa Fe Springs, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of this court at whose direction the service was made. Young Cho ___ TYPE OR PRINT NAME /s/ Young Cho____________ SIGNATURE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?