Torres v. Carescope LLC et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/15/2017 ORDERING: the Plaintiff to file her Motion for Class Certification within thirty (30) days of this order. ORDEREDING the parties to file an updated Joint Status Report on the same date propos ing new dates with regards to the remainder of the Scheduling Order. If Plaintiff has chosen to continue as an individual, then the parties shall propose new dates for discovery and preparation for trial. Failure to adhere to this Court will result in the imposition of sanctions. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ANTONETT TORRES, on behalf of all current and former employees and the State of California, 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:15-cv-00198-TLN-CKD ORDER v. CARESCOPE LLC d/b/a A VOICE FOR SENIORS, BIANCA VUE, and FRANK SIM, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter involves an alleged class action for wage and hour violations. The Court 20 issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order on July 6, 2016. (ECF No. 16.) The Scheduling Order set the 21 date for a Motion for Class Certification for May 4, 2017. The Court issued a Minute Order on 22 May 12, 2017, notifying Plaintiff of her failure to timely file her Motion for Class Certification. 23 (ECF No. 30.) The Court ordered the parties to file an updated Joint Status Report within 30 days 24 of the Minute Order or risk the imposition of sanctions. (ECF No. 30.) The parties filed an 25 updated Joint Status Report on June 9, 2017, but did not address the issue of Plaintiff’s failure to 26 timely file a Motion for Class Certification and its effect on the dates in the Scheduling Order. 27 (ECF No. 31.) 28 The case cannot progress without a determination on a Motion for Class Certification or 1 1 decision to pursue the claims as an individual. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with a class action, 2 she is required to file a Motion for Class Certification. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to 3 file her Motion for Class Certification within thirty (30) days of this order. Additionally, the 4 parties are ORDERED to file an updated Joint Status Report on the same date proposing new 5 dates with regards to the remainder of the Scheduling Order. If Plaintiff has chosen to continue 6 as an individual, then the parties shall propose new dates for discovery and preparation for trial. 7 Failure to adhere to this Court will result in the imposition of sanctions. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: June 15, 2017 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?