Torres v. Carescope LLC et al

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/06/21 ORDERING parties to file a further updated joint statement regarding the status of their discovery dispute by 01/03/22. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ANTONETT TORRES, on behalf of all current and former employees and the State of California, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, No. 2:15–cv–0198-TLN-CKD ORDER v. CARESCOPE LLC (dba VOICE FOR SENIORS) AND FRANK SIM, Defendants. Plaintiff Antonett Torres filed this wage and hour class action alleging defendants failed to 19 properly maintain records reflecting employees’ hours worked and failed to compensate plaintiff 20 and other non-exempt employees for all hours worked. On October 6, 2021, plaintiff moved to 21 compel the production of documents from defendant Carescope, LLC (dba A Voice for Seniors). 22 (ECF No. 68.) A hearing on this matter took place via Zoom on October 27, 2021. Following that 23 hearing, the court directed the parties to file a further updated joint statement regarding the status 24 of their discovery dispute no later than December 1, 2021. 25 The further updated joint statement is before the court. (ECF No. 76.) The parties state 26 they have reached a compromise and they believe this dispute will be resolved once defendant’s 27 counsel obtains a verified discovery response and serves it on plaintiff’s counsel. The parties 28 request the court to set a due date for a further status report approximately 30 days out. 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a further 2 updated joint statement regarding the status of their discovery dispute no later than January 3, 3 2022. 4 Dated: December 6, 2021 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 8.torr0198.status 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?