Torres v. Carescope LLC et al
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/06/21 ORDERING parties to file a further updated joint statement regarding the status of their discovery dispute by 01/03/22. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ANTONETT TORRES, on behalf of all
current and former employees and the State
of California,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
No. 2:15–cv–0198-TLN-CKD
ORDER
v.
CARESCOPE LLC (dba VOICE FOR
SENIORS) AND FRANK SIM,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Antonett Torres filed this wage and hour class action alleging defendants failed to
19
properly maintain records reflecting employees’ hours worked and failed to compensate plaintiff
20
and other non-exempt employees for all hours worked. On October 6, 2021, plaintiff moved to
21
compel the production of documents from defendant Carescope, LLC (dba A Voice for Seniors).
22
(ECF No. 68.) A hearing on this matter took place via Zoom on October 27, 2021. Following that
23
hearing, the court directed the parties to file a further updated joint statement regarding the status
24
of their discovery dispute no later than December 1, 2021.
25
The further updated joint statement is before the court. (ECF No. 76.) The parties state
26
they have reached a compromise and they believe this dispute will be resolved once defendant’s
27
counsel obtains a verified discovery response and serves it on plaintiff’s counsel. The parties
28
request the court to set a due date for a further status report approximately 30 days out.
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a further
2
updated joint statement regarding the status of their discovery dispute no later than January 3,
3
2022.
4
Dated: December 6, 2021
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
8.torr0198.status
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?