Torres v. Carescope LLC et al
Filing
86
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/15/2022 GRANTING 85 Request for Continuation of Deadlines. Parties' deadline to submit the settlement agreement is EXTENDED by two weeks until 4/28/2022. Parties' deadline to submit dismissal of the action is EXTENDED by two weeks until 5/13/2022. (Zignago, K.)
1 STAN S. MALLISON (SBN 184191)
StanM@TheMMLawFirm.com
2 HECTOR R. MARTINEZ (SBN 206336)
HectorM@TheMMLawFirm.com
3 HEATHER HAMILTON (SBN 332545)
HHamilton@TheMMLawFirm.com
4 MALLISON & MARTINEZ
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730
5 Oakland, California 94612-3547
Telephone: (510) 832-9999
6 Facsimile: (510) 832-1101
7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – DISTRICT OF SACRAMENTO
10
CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-00198-TLN-CKD
ANTONETT TORRES, on behalf of all current
11 and former employees and the State of
California
12
Plaintiff,
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
CONTINUATION OF DEADLINE
HONORABLE JUDGE ALLISON CLAIRE
14 vs.
15 CARESCOPE LLC (dba VOICE FOR
SENIORS) and FRANK SIM
16
Defendants.
17
COMPLAINT FILED: JANUARY 26, 2015
ASSIGNED TO JUDGE TROY L. NUNLEY
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
i
27
28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00198-TLN-CKD
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The Court, having fully considered Plaintiff’s request for continuation of Parties’ deadline
3 to submit the settlement agreement,
4
HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
5
Parties’ deadline to submit the settlement agreement be extended by two weeks until April
6 28, 2022;
7
Parties’ deadline to submit dismissal of the action be extended by two weeks until May 13,
8 2022.
9
10
11 IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: April 15, 2022
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00198-TLN-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?