Torres v. Carescope LLC et al

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/29/22 GRANTING 87 Request for Continuation of Deadlines. Parties' deadline to submit the settlement agreement is EXTENDED by two weeks until 5/12/22. Parties' deadline to submit dismissal of the action is EXTENDED by two weeks until 5/27/2022.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 STAN S. MALLISON (SBN 184191) StanM@TheMMLawFirm.com 2 HECTOR R. MARTINEZ (SBN 206336) HectorM@TheMMLawFirm.com 3 HEATHER HAMILTON (SBN 332545) HHamilton@TheMMLawFirm.com 4 MALLISON & MARTINEZ 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730 5 Oakland, California 94612-3547 Telephone: (510) 832-9999 6 Facsimile: (510) 832-1101 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – DISTRICT OF SACRAMENTO 10 CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-00198-TLN-CKD ANTONETT TORRES, on behalf of all current 11 and former employees and the State of California 12 Plaintiff, 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUATION OF DEADLINE HONORABLE JUDGE ALLISON CLAIRE 14 vs. 15 CARESCOPE LLC (dba VOICE FOR SENIORS) and FRANK SIM 16 Defendants. 17 COMPLAINT FILED: JANUARY 26, 2015 ASSIGNED TO JUDGE TROY L. NUNLEY 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 i 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00198-TLN-CKD 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 The Court, having fully considered Plaintiff’s request for continuation of Parties’ deadline 3 to submit the settlement agreement, 4 HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 5 Parties’ deadline to submit the settlement agreement be extended by two weeks until May 6 12, 2022; 7 Parties’ deadline to submit dismissal of the action be extended by two weeks until May 27, 8 2022. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 Dated: April 29, 2022 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00198-TLN-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?