Torres v. Carescope LLC et al

Filing 93

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/27/2022 AMENDING Dismissal date to comply with settlement agreement and ORDERING that Plaintiff's deadline to submit a Request of Dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice is SET for 5/25/2024 contingent on Defendant's compliance with the payment schedule. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 6 STAN S. MALLISON (SBN 184191) StanM@TheMMLawFirm.com HECTOR R. MARTINEZ (SBN 206336) HectorM@TheMMLawFirm.com HEATHER M. HAMILTON (SBN 332545) HHamilton@TheMMLawFirm.com MALLISON & MARTINEZ 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730 Oakland, California 94612-3547 Telephone: (510) 832-9999 Facsimile: (510) 832-1101 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ANTONETT TORRES, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CARESCOPE, LLC dba VOICE FOR ) ) SENIORS, ) ) Defendant, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-CV-00198-TLN-CKD JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND DISMISSAL DATE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Before Magistrate Judge Caroline K. Delaney Proposed Dismissal Date: May 25, 2024 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO AMEND DISMISSAL DATE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT STIPULATION 1 2 Plaintiff Antonett Torres (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel, the law 3 firm of Mallison & Martinez, and Defendant CARESCOPE, LLC dba VOICE 4 FOR SENIORS (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel, Levangie Law Group, 5 hereby stipulate and agree to amend Plaintiff dismissal date to comply with the 6 settlement agreement as a matter of course. 7 8 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS, on May 20, 2022, the Parties finalized a Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims; WHEREAS, the Parties agreed that Defendant shall make a Settlement Payment in quarterly installments after an initial payment of $25,000; WHEREAS, the Parties determined that Defendant shall make its final quarterly installment on May 15, 2024; 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to dismiss the litigation in its entirety with 14 prejudice within 10 business days of the receipt of the final payment by Plaintiff’s 15 Counsel. 16 17 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties STIPULATE as follows and respectfully request the Court amend the dismissal date as follows: 18 • Plaintiff’s deadline to submit a Request of Dismissal of the Litigation 19 with prejudice is set on May 25, 2024 contingent on Defendant’s 20 compliance with the payment schedule. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: June 22, 2022 MALLISON & MARTINEZ By: ______________________________ Stan S. Mallison Hector R. Martinez Heather M. Hamilton Attorneys for Antonett Torres -2- JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO AMEND DISMISSAL DATE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATED: June 22, 2022 LEVANGIE LAW GROUP By: _____/s/_______________________ Michael J. Levangie Sharon B. Futerman Attorneys for Defendant CARESCOPE, LLC dba VOICE FOR SENIORS 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO AMEND DISMISSAL DATE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 The Court, having fully considered the settlement agreement, HEREBY ORDERS that 4 1. Plaintiff’s deadline to submit a Request of Dismissal of the 5 Litigation with prejudice be set on May 25, 2024 contingent on 6 Defendant’s compliance with the payment schedule. 7 8 9 10 11 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 27, 2022 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO AMEND DISMISSAL DATE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?