Crane v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 178

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/16/18 ADOPTING in full 171 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Defendants' 155 motion requiring security. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN v. ORDER RODRIGUEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 6, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 171.) 23 Defendants Davey, Rodriguez, Probst, Barton and Robinette, and Plaintiff have filed objections to 24 the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 172.) Plaintiff was granted until September 26, 25 2018, in which to file objections; Plaintiff’s objections were filed on October 1, 2018. (ECF No. 26 177.) 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 1 1 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 6, 2018 are adopted in full; and 5 2. Defendants’ motion requiring security (ECF No. 155) is denied. 6 7 Dated: October 16, 2018 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?