Crane v. Rodriguez et al
Filing
178
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/16/18 ADOPTING in full 171 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Defendants' 155 motion requiring security. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN
v.
ORDER
RODRIGUEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 6, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 171.)
23
Defendants Davey, Rodriguez, Probst, Barton and Robinette, and Plaintiff have filed objections to
24
the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 172.) Plaintiff was granted until September 26,
25
2018, in which to file objections; Plaintiff’s objections were filed on October 1, 2018. (ECF No.
26
177.)
27
28
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
1
1
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
2
analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 6, 2018 are adopted in full; and
5
2. Defendants’ motion requiring security (ECF No. 155) is denied.
6
7
Dated: October 16, 2018
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?