Crane v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 211

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/27/2020 GRANTING 210 Request for Clarification, see Order for clarification. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER CLARIFYING APRIL 22, 2020
ORDER

RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. On April 22, 2020, a request for

18

clarification of the court’s order addressing the in-camera review (ECF No. 209) was filed by the

19

group defendants. (ECF No. 210.) The court apologizes for the confusion, and clarifies the April

20

22, 2020 order as follows. In connection with the production of confidential memos concerning

21

inmate Dolihite, the group defendants submitted confidential memos with proposed redactions

22

(1097, 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102.) The group defendants shall redact such documents as

23

proposed. Plaintiff shall be permitted to review a copy of such memos as redacted. In other

24

words, plaintiff may not view the redacted portions of such confidential memos.

25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREEBY ORDERED that the request for clarification (ECF No.

26

209) is granted; and the April 22, 2020 order is clarified as set forth above.

27

Dated: April 27, 2020
/cran0208.cla

28