Crane v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 278

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/1/22 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration 272 , the order of the magistrate 266 is AFFIRMED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RICHARD J. CRANE,

11
12
13

No. 2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. Following extensions of time, on

17

January 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed

18

November 12, 2021, denying Plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 266). Defendants oppose this

19

request. (ECF Nos. 273, 275.) Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders

20

shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file,

21

the Court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or

22

contrary to law.

23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration (ECF No. 272), the

24

order of the magistrate judge filed November 12, 2021 (ECF No. 266) is affirmed.

25

DATED: February 1, 2022

26
27
28

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
1