Crane v. Rodriguez et al
Filing
331
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 03/27/2023 ADOPTING 322 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 236 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the following Claims: 1) Plaintiff's claims regarding the 01/16/2013 incident bas ed on plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies (including the related claim against defendant Davey); 2) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Robinette regarding the 01/22/2011 incident as without merit; and 3) Plaintiff' s claims against Defendant Davey regarding the 03/01/2013 incident as without merit; DENYING in all other respects the 236 Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of Defendants Barton, etc.; DENYING 240 Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of Defendant Weeks; DENYING 328 Plaintiff's second Motion for Extension of Time. (Rodriguez, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD CRANE,
12
No. 2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ORDER
RODRIGUEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 5, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for extension of time to file
24
25
objections to the January 5, 2023 findings and recommendations.1 (ECF No. 328.) In the
26
pending motion, Plaintiff states that on February 15, 2023, he filed a motion for clarification. (Id.
27
28
On February 3, 2023, the magistrate judge granted Plaintiff’s first motion requesting a thirtyday extension of time to file objections. (ECF No. 324.)
1
1
1
at 1.) Plaintiff indicates that he cannot file objections until the Court rules on his motion for
2
clarification. (Id. at 1–2.) On March 20, 2023, the magistrate judge denied plaintiff’s motion for
3
clarification. (ECF No. 330.) The magistrate judge found that the arguments raised in Plaintiff’s
4
motion for clarification do not concern the instant action. (Id.) In the pending motion, Plaintiff
5
also claims he needs additional time to “research and prepare.” (ECF No. 328 at 2.) Plaintiff
6
does not explain why he was unable to prepare his objections during the time previously granted
7
by the Court. For the reasons discussed above, this Court finds that Plaintiff has not shown good
8
cause to grant his second motion for extension of time to file objections. Accordingly, this
9
motion is DENIED.
10
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
11
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
12
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
13
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2023, are ADOPTED IN FULL;
14
2. The motion for summary judgment on behalf of Defendants Barton, etc. (ECF No. 236)
15
is GRANTED as to the following claims: 1) Plaintiff’s claims regarding the January 16, 2013
16
incident based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies (including the related
17
claim against defendant Davey); 2) Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Robinette regarding the
18
January 22, 2011 incident as without merit; and 3) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Davey
19
regarding the March 1, 2013 incident as without merit;
20
21
3. The motion for summary judgment on behalf of Defendants Barton, etc. (ECF No. 236)
is DENIED in all other respects;
22
23
4. The motion for summary judgment on behalf of Defendant Weeks (ECF No. 240) is
DENIED;
5. Plaintiff’s second motion for extension of time to file objections (ECF No. 328) is
24
25
DENIED.
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
Date: March 27, 2023
2
3
4
5
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?