Crane v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 339

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/6/2023 SETTING a Settlement Conference for 2/8/2024 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire, via Zoom video. The parties shall submit confidential settlement statements no later than 2/1/2024, in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on RJDCF Litigation Office. (cc: AC, ADR)(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD J. CRANE,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.
RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding with court appointed limited purpose counsel, with

18

a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. The court has determined that this case will

19

benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Allison

20

Claire to conduct a settlement conference on February 8, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The settlement

21

conference will be conducted by remote means, with all parties appearing by Zoom video

22

conference. The Court will issue the necessary transportation order in due course.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on

25

February 8, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by remote means,

26

with all parties appearing by Zoom video conference.

27
28

2. Parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the
Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The individual
1

1

with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the

2

settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a

3

person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the

4

face to face conference. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can

5

be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle 1.

6

3. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than February

7

1, 2024 to [e-mail]. Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of Submission

8

of Confidential Settlement Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).
Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served

9
10

on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with

11

the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.
The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,

12
13

typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

14

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

15

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon

16

which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district
court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in
mandatory settlement conferences….” United States v. United States District Court for the
Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district
court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory settlement conference[s].”).
The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation
conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time
to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph
Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides,
Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle
must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of
the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz.
2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz.
2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face
conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar
amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to
settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).
2

1

prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in

2

dispute.

3

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

4

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and

5

trial.

6

e. The relief sought.

7

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a

8

history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.

9

g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement

10

conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay.

11

h. If the parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims

12

not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above,

13

including case number(s) if applicable.

14

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order via fax on the Litigation

15

Office at RJ Donovan Correctional Facility at [phone] or via email.

16

Dated: October 6, 2023

17
18
19
20

/cran0208.med

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3