Crane v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 362

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 11/21/2024 GRANTING Plaintiff's 360 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's reply to Defendants' 359 Opposition to Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses due within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD J. CRANE,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0208 TLN CSK P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file a reply to defendants’ opposition to the

18

motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

19

ORDERED that:

20

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 360) is granted; and

21

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a reply to

22

defendants’ opposition to the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses.

23
24

Dated: November 21, 2024

25
26
27
28

/1/cran0208.ext

1