Freshko Produce Services, Inc. v. A.L.L. Groups, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/16. Freshko is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow this Court's order and for failure to prosecute under FRCP 41(b). (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRESHKO PRODUCE SERVICES, INC.,

12
13
14
15
16
17

No. 2:15-cv-00234-KJM-AC

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

A.L.L. GROUPS, INC., a California
corporation d/b/a VIC’S DISCOUNT
MARKET and d/b/a VIC’S MARKET, and
ASHWANI KUMAR MAYER, an
individual,
Defendants.

18
19
20

On November 17, 2015, the court ordered, in relevant parts, that plaintiff Freshko

21

Produce Services, Inc. (Freshko) file a status report within ninety (90) days of the order to advise

22

the court of the status of defendants’ bankruptcy filings. Ninety days has passed but as of the date

23

of this order, Freshko has yet to file a status report. Freshko is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE

24

why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow this court’s order and for failure to

25

prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See also Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S.

26

626, 631–33 (1962) (a district court may dismiss a complaint for failure to prosecute sua sponte).

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 22, 2016
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE